The Importance of
Neuro-Linguistic Programming
To Process Work
By Alan James Strachan, Ph.D
In River's Way Mindell writes that "Behaviorists such as Grinder and
Bandler challenged me to discover the unconscious in their behaviorist's
reality." (1985a, page vii) In this section I will describe some of the
ways in which Mindell has incorporated the basic principles and approaches of
Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) into Process Work, including utilization of
information channels, emphasis upon sensory-based information, methods of
establishing rapport, recognition that people favor certain channels, and
emphasis upon awareness as a way of distinguishing between conscious and
unconscious.
The
concept of information being conveyed in discrete channels was developed as
part of information theory. Bandler and Grinder applied the channel concept to
psychotherapy. In The Structure of Magic, Vol. II, Bandler and
Grinder write that
There are three major input
channels by which
we, as human beings, receive information about the world around us---vision, audition, and kinesthetics (body sensations). (The remaining
two most commonly accepted sensory input channels---smell and taste---are,
apparently, little utilized as ways of gaining information about the world.)
(Bandler and Grinder, 1976, pages 4-5)
Mindell
appears to have followed NLP in applying the use of the word and the general
concept of "channel" to psychological phenomena. Along with NLP,
Process Work recognizes the visual and auditory channels and does not emphasize
either smell or taste. The NLP focus on the kinesthetic channel has been
differentiated by Mindell into the proprioceptive (body sensations) and
kinesthetic (movement) channels. Mindell also acknowledges two composite
channels which he refers to as "relationship" and "world."
Writing
about the relationship channel, Mindell observes that "Modern
neurolinguistic programmers practice Freudian theory in so far as personal
relationships between the individual and therapist are avoided because they
create dependence." (1985a, page 40) Bandler and Grinder describe their
relationship with the client as 'uptime."
We
know what outcomes we want, and we put ourselves into what we call
"uptime," in which we're completely in sensory experience and have no
consciousness at all. We aren't aware of our internal feelings, pictures,
voices, or anything else internal. We are in sensory experience in relationship
to you and noticing how you respond to us. We keep changing our behavior until
you respond the way we want you to.
Right
now I know what I'm saying because I'm listening to myself externally. I know
how much sense you're making of what I'm saying by your responses to it, both
conscious and unconscious. I am seeing those. I'm not commenting on them
internally, simply noticing them and adjusting my behavior. I have no idea what
I feel like internally. I have tactile kinesthetic awareness. I can feel my
hand on my jacket, for instance. It's a particular altered state. It's one
trance out of many, and a useful one for leading groups. (Bandler and Grinder,
1979, page 55)
Bandler
and Grinder are attempting to stay within a strictly behaviorist
stimulus-response model, one in which only the client is acknowledged to have
an internal reality. Such an approach limits the range of information
considered by the therapist, and therefore the range of available
interventions. In this respect the NLP model is radically different from
Process Work, in which the relationship channel is acknowledged and is
considered critical (to varying degrees) to most if not all therapeutic
encounters.
A
further difference is that Mindell, following the Jungian model, has
differentiated each channel into introverted and extraverted aspects. Mindell
has described this aspect of the channel system in River's Way.
Another
connection between NLP and Process Work is the degree to which both emphasize
the role of the therapist in gathering precise sensory-based information, both
verbal and nonverbal, in the different channels. This is a central focus of
Process Work, as it was in NLP, and many of the specific information-gathering
approaches (such as attending to eye movements and the predicates a person uses
to describe her situation) appear to be derived from NLP.
In
both systems the therapist utilizes the information gathered to establish
rapport on both verbal and nonverbal levels with the client. In NLP this is known
as "matching":
To effectively gather information or
beginning a process of change it will always be important to establish rapport
between yourself and your client at both the conscious and unconscious level.
An invaluable technique for doing just this is to generate verbal and nonverbal
behavior which matches that of your client. This called "matching."
The client's subjective experience becomes one of being really understood.
(Cameron-Bandler, 1978, page 64)
This
process of joining the inner world of the client is an essential aspect of
Process Work. NLP provided many insights about how to match with precision, and
these are an implicit part of Mindell's system.
Awareness of the Channels
A
fourth parallel is the fact that although information is being processed in all
channels simultaneously, people have different degrees of awareness of the
separate channels. Bandler and
Grinder write:
How many here now see clearly that
they are visually oriented people? How many people see that? How many people
here feel that they are really kinesthetically oriented people in their
process? Who tell themselves that they are auditory? Actually all of you are doing all of the things
we're talking about, all the time. The only question is, which portion of the complex
internal process do you bring into awareness? All channels are processing
information all the time, but only part of that will be in consciousness.
(1979, page 34)
People
tend to be aware of or favor certain channels over the others. In NLP this favoritism
is referred to as the person's lead system and their representational system.
In Process Work Mindell refers to it as the main and unoccupied channels.
The Importance of the Lesser-Used
Channels
Both
NLP and Process Work maintain that experiences which occur in lesser-used
channels tend to be quite powerful. Bandler and Grinder describe this
phenomenon as follows:
If you use guided fantasy with your
clients, there are some clients you use it with automatically and it works
fine. Other people you wouldn't even try it with. What's the criterion you use
to decide that, do you know? If they can visualize easily, you use visual
guided fantasy, right? We're suggesting that you reverse that. Because for people who do not
normally visualize in consciousness, visual guided fantasy will be a
mind-blowing, profound change experience. For those who visualize all the time,
it will be far less useful. (1979, page 44)
In
the same fashion Mindell writes that
The main and unoccupied channels are
important for the process worker for if he can determine which channel is a
primary one and which the unoccupied or secondary, then the main channel can be
use to integrate irrational secondary processes. An unoccupied channel will
bring the client the most powerful and uncontrolled experience. (1985a, page
24)
Finally,
in both systems there is an emphasis on awareness as the key to distinguishing
between conscious and unconscious. Bandler and Grinder advise people not to
...get caught by the words
'conscious' and 'unconscious.' They are not real. They are just a way of
describing events that is useful in the context called therapeutic change.
'Conscious' is defined as whatever you are aware of at a moment in time.
'Unconscious' is everything else. (1979, page 37)
Mindell
makes the same distinction when he writes that "...consciousness refers
only to those processes of which you are completely aware....unconsciousness
refers to all other types of signal processes." (1985a, page 13)
Conclusion
At
the beginning of this section I quoted Mindell saying that Bandler and Grinder
challenged him to discover the unconscious in their behaviorist's reality. The
behaviorist reality of Bandler and Grinder focuses with precision upon a wide
range of verbal and nonverbal cues. Attending to these clues enables the
therapist to construct an accurate model of the client's (often unconscious)
inner world. Ideally the therapist is then able to enter that world to
facilitate change.
Mindell's
greatest debt to NLP is derived from the range and precision with which Bandler
and Grinder attended to the client's signals and the use of the channel concept
as a means of categorizing the signals. This approach has been critical to the
development of Process Work.
The
way in which Mindell has developed signal awareness and the channel structure
differs considerably from the NLP model. For example, the inclusion of
relationship and world channels makes Mindell's model a more encompassing one,
so that Process Work operates from different premises and allows a greater
range of interventions. Consequently the way in which a Process-Oriented
Therapist interacts with a client could---and likely would---differ in many
ways from a Neuro-Linguistic Programmer. Since my purpose here is to describe
what Mindell appears to have derived from NLP, it is beyond the scope of this
section to emphasize the differences between the two systems in greater detail.
Bandler,
R., & Grinder, J. (1976). The structure of magic, Vol. II. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior
Books.
Bandler,
R., & Grinder, J. (1979). Frogs Into princes. Moab, UT: Real People Press.
Mindell,
A. (1985a). River’s way: The process science of
the dreambody. London:
Routledge & Kegan Paul.
(This article was originally published in The Dreaming Body: A Case Study
Of The Relationship Between Chronic Body Symptoms And Childhood Dreams
According To Process Work. Ph.D. Dissertation for the
Institute of Transpersonal Psychology, 1992)